Signature Bank failed to understand risks associated with crypto: FDIC chair

A related report penned down by FDIC Chief Risk Officer cited poor management as “the root cause of Signature Bank’s failure.”

Investigations around the collapse of Signature Bank point toward illiquidity circumstances and poor management. However, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) chairman, Martin J. Gruenberg, believes that the bank’s failure to understand the risks associated with cryptocurrencies expedited its fall.

Speaking at the hearing on “Oversight of Prudential Regulators,” Gruenberg highlighted the recent failures of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Silvergate Bank, which eventually manifested in large declines in stock prices and subsequent deposit outflows at other banks.

A related report penned down by FDIC Chief Risk Officer cited poor management as “the root cause of Signature Bank’s failure.” While pointing out Signature Bank’s overreliance on uninsured deposits without proper risk controls, Gruenberg added:

“Additionally, the bank failed to understand the risk of its association with, and reliance on, crypto industry deposits or its vulnerability to contagion from crypto industry turmoil that occurred in late 2022 and into 2023.”

Although regulators and banking professionals agree on deposit runs as one of the key drivers of bank collapses, former SVB CEO Greg Becker blamed rising interest rates among the aforementioned factors for its demise.

According to Becker, no bank “could survive a bank run of that velocity and magnitude.” Gruenberg revealed that the failures of SVB and Signature Bank resulted in losses of $16.1 billion and $2.4 billion, respectively. Concluding the discussion, Gruenberg said that banks with assets of $100 billion or more “merit special attention, including consideration of a long-term debt requirement to facilitate orderly resolutions.”

Related: FDIC pins Signature Bank’s failure on poor governance and illiquidity

On the flipside, the United States Government Accountability Office’s (GAO) preliminary review did not explicitly blame crypto exposure for the collapse of Signature Bank.

As previously reported by Cointelegraph, many regulators and lawmakers continue to invoke the collapses of Signature Bank, Silicon Valley Bank and Silvergate Bank in discussions around crypto.